Since its conception, FryRender has been designed with the aim of being the most muscled engine in its category. Processor Performance: FryRenderįryRender is a benchmarking framework for everyone, not just for 3D users anyone out there, from hardware integrators or hardware reviewers to die-hard gamers. In these charts we show you several CPUs and platforms. The higher the number, the faster the processor. The test scene contains approximately 2,000 objects containing more than 300,000 total polygons and uses sharp and blurred reflections, area lights and shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and much more. The Cinema 4D engine can use systems with up to 64 processor threads which makes it rather future proof and also excellent for multi-core processors. This scene makes use of various different algorithms to stress all available processor cores. This test scenario uses all of your system's processing power to render a photorealistic 3D scene (from the viral "No Keyframes" animation by AixSponza).
#I5 6600k cinebench software#
MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Spider-Man, Star Wars, The Chronicles of Narnia and many more. CINEBENCH is based on MAXON's animation software CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. The i5-6600K cannot match the performance of hyper-threading Core i7s, however its target audience is not necessarily consumers who will be running heavy, multi-threaded workloads on a regular occurrence.Tweet Processor performance: CineBench 11.5ĬINEBENCH is a real-world cross platform test suite that evaluates your computer's performance capabilities. Unsurprisingly, the six- and eight-core Haswell-E chips top the performance chart, however Skylake's modern architecture and support for fast DDR4 memory allow the stock-clocked 6700K to leapfrog the overclocked 4790K in our archival test. Remove the frequency shackles from Haswell-E's lowest-cost, six-core chip and the beast opens up a comfortable performance lead of 22%.ħ-Zip loves fast cores and functions well with hyper-threading. Switching the reference point to pricing similarities, it takes a 1.1GHz operating speed benefit for the almost identically-priced 6700K to match the performance of a stock-clocked Haswell-E 5820K. Pushed forward by its newer micro-architecture, the overclocked four-core i5-6600K is nipping at the heels of a stock-clocked, hyper-threading 4790K. Our Handbrake conversion test registers the Skylake i7 with a distinctive performance lead over Devil's Canyon's 4790K.
A high operating frequency wins the game with Super Pi, but Skylake manages to open a clock-for-clock lead over the Haswell architecture. Super Pi's single-threaded workload continues to shine a positive light on the Skylake architecture. Skylake's architectural benefits are indicated by the 3.9GHz i5-6600K nearing the performance of an £800 4.4GHz 5960X and the 6700K almost matching the overclocked 4790K while sporting a 500MHz speed deficit. The highly-overclocked 6600K and 6700K chips take assertive performance leads with only a 4.7GHz 4790K left to split them from the stock-clocked 6700K. The i5 puts in positive numbers, although Cinebench shows off the benefit that extra cache and hyper-threading cores deliver to rendering workloads.Ĭinebench's single-core rendering test is perhaps one of the best ways to show Skylake's IPC improvements. With the Skylake and Devil's Canyon i7 CPUs both overclocked to 4.7GHz, Intel's new 14nm part outperforms yesteryear's LGA 1150 fan favourite by just over 9%. Despite its 200MHz speed deficit, the stock-clocked 6700K manages to outperform the Devil's Canyon 4790K by 4%. The Skylake CPUs make a positive start in Cinebench's multi-core rendering test.
#I5 6600k cinebench mp4#
We used the built in benchmark to indicate theoretical 7-Zip performance and we also manually archive a 1.23GB MP4 game recording.
#I5 6600k cinebench 1080p#
We measured the average frame rate achieved for a task of converting a 1.23GB 1080P game recording using the High Profile setting and MP4 container. We used the 32M test in Super Pi to analyse single-threaded performance. We used the ‘CPU’ test built into Cinebench R15 to test single and multi-core performance.
0 kommentar(er)
